There were slightly significant lower odds (AOR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.247 ‐ 1.011; p = 0.054) See Table 1.
← all phrases
“slightly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.06p=0.09
In the literature
Finally, linear regression analysis revealed that education level was a slightly significant predictor of total child restraint knowledge (β = 0.198, P = 0.054).
4 However, we found a relationship between the severity of trauma and the occurrence of vasospasm that was significant for MCA and ACA vasospasm (p < 0.05), and slightly significant for BA vasospasm (p = 0.054).
However, the Cochrane Armitage Trend test did reveal that there was a slightly significant trend of increasing medication adherence as disease status progressed (p=0.055).
In our study, a slightly significant difference (p=0.055) was found between the first-day PCT levels (PCT-1) of FN episodes in bacteremic and nonbacteremic patients.
The mean operative time was longer in Group I, and there was a slightly significant difference between the two groups ( P = 0.055).
A significant increase of the fluorescence intensity over the control was observed after exposure to BPA (p = 0.002) and co-exposure to BPA and KBrO 3 (p = 0.0012), and a slightly significant increase was observed after KBrO 3 alone (p = 0.055, Fig. 3 ).
This difference is slightly significant according to a two-sided Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.055).
Also, there was a slightly significant main effect in the negative arousal condition, F (3,69) = 2.641, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.103, again the hit rate for happy faces being higher than for neutral expressions ( p = 0.038).
Similarly, among the NCES group, a slightly significant difference in the extent of repigmentation was noted when comparing between 1st and 2nd month of follow-up ( P = 0.057).
Also, Vb mean value, as seen in Table 4 , shows that the difference between means in enhanced and non-enhanced lesions was slightly significant (P<0.057).
While regarding to FBS slightly significant (p = 0.058).
For the randomized condition of Set A, there was slightly significant difference from pre- to post-group collaboration ( F [1, 351] = 2.49, p = 0.058, r = 0.08).
A slightly significant interaction effect (Model B t1 : group × proactive parenting behavior t1: F (1,39) = 3.82, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.09) and a slightly significant three-way interaction effect (Model B t1 : group x proactive parenting behavior t1 × time: F (1,39) = 3.90, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.09) were found.
Results of the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference in PD, CAL, and serum prolactin level among the 3 study groups (P ≤ 0.001, P = 0.001, and P ≤ 0.001 respectively), while BOP was slightly significant (P = 0.058), whereas mobility was not significantly different among the 3 groups (P = 0.214), as shown in Table 2 .
We found a slightly significant interaction between Experimental Condition X Surface X Phase [F (1, 5) = 5.96, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.50], which revealed a lower forward drift for SS compared to NFS in the C phase and only in the CIon condition.
And there was a slightly significant interaction effect among “Condition” and “Group” (p < 0.059).
A slightly significant difference for P75NTR mRNA expression ( z = −1.886, p = 0.059) was detected between pre- and post-exercise.
At multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, age, BMI, T2D, ALT, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and statin use, the effect of Lp(a) on these cardiovascular risk factors remained slightly significant for carotid plaques (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.98‐2.03; P = 0.06) whereas it was lost for hypertension (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.64‐1.69; P = 0.13) (Supporting Table S2 ).
A significant increase in the IL2-TNF population was observed in the Woods IP nonlethal model at 21 dpi compared to the lethal model at 10 dpi (a slightly significant increase ( p = 0.06) was also observed in the Woods IP nonlethal model at 21 dpi when compared to the lethal model at 14 dpi.).
Slightly significant differences were observed in female patients (5.1% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.06).
However, the pre-diabetes/HTN group showed a slightly significant risk (HR = 1.19; CI: 0.98, 1.43, P = 0.06) ( 10 ).
A slightly significant three‐way interaction effect was found ( F (19,160) = 1.61, p = 0.06), which could mask a single significant fungal protein effect of the lectin CGL2, which also dispersed the biofilm of L. innocua , while all other fungal proteins only affected adhesion (Figures 1 and 2 ).
TEG MA parameters were slightly significantly lower in patients with HMII devices ( p = 0.06).
A small but slightly significant increase in T REGS was observed for responder T REGS of TLR3-MSC group in comparison to the un-MSC group (1 ± 0.8 % Vs 0.4 ± 0.2 %; p = 0.06; Fig. 3 C). 3.6 TLR-primed mesenchymal stromal cell pre-treatment does not modulate the responder B lymphocytes Similar to T cells, B cells are also considered imperative mediators of the immune system.