a negative trendP = 0.06
Additionally, wIS showed a negative trend with apo(a) PR ( P = 0.06) ( Fig. 2 C) and this relationship became statistically significant when controlling for SRRE ( P = 0.03) ( Fig. 2 D).
Additionally, wIS showed a negative trend with apo(a) PR ( P = 0.06) ( Fig. 2 C) and this relationship became statistically significant when controlling for SRRE ( P = 0.03) ( Fig. 2 D).
When we examined the relationships of FCR with wIS , we found a positive trend ( P = 0.08) ( Fig. 2 A).
examined the role of isoforms in larger diverse cohorts ( 56 ) showing associations similar to those found in our cohort, with Blacks having higher Lp(a) level for the same apo(a) isoform size than Whites, even though the difference did not reach statistical significance in our study due to the limited subject number.