approached significancep = 0.053
In CVC, S-Heb2 scored significantly lower ( p < 0.001) in NR than R, while nS-Heb2 approached significance ( p = 0.053), with higher accuracy in R.
In CVC, S-Heb2 scored significantly lower ( p < 0.001) in NR than R, while nS-Heb2 approached significance ( p = 0.053), with higher accuracy in R.
nS-Heb2 also scored significantly lower in R than NR in the TCR ( p < 0.001), HVM ( p < 0.001), and B(–) ( p < 0.001), but no significant differences were shown in mVCCVC ( p = 0.317) and B(+) ( p = 0.284), and in CVC, approaching significance ( p = 0.053) with higher scores in R ( Table 3 ).