Hence, Marmolejo et al.’s (2009) study also showed a trend of higher false recognition in L1L2 than L2L1, similar to previous studies.
← all excerpts
False memory in between-language conditions: a brief review on the effect of encoding and retrieving in different languages.
2
—
—
The sentences
Regarding the primary interest of this review, comparing L1L2 and L2L1, the corrected proportions of false recognition in the first trial suggested a clear trend: false recognition was higher in L1L2 than in L2L1 (0.32 vs. 0.25, respectively), although this was not statistically tested.