near-significantp = 0.0002
Significant or near-significant differences were found in the localization of the primary tumor (extrapelvic localization 86.4 vs. 61.6%, p = 0.0002) and the rate of applied MA (13.6 vs. 24.2%, p = 0.0686).
Significant or near-significant differences were found in the localization of the primary tumor (extrapelvic localization 86.4 vs. 61.6%, p = 0.0002) and the rate of applied MA (13.6 vs. 24.2%, p = 0.0686).
Though there were no significant differences between the outcomes of subgroups with or without EBRT, the mOS values showed a clear trend in favor of EBRT (673 vs. 517 days, p = 0.0983).
All publications showed a highly significant difference between the PTR and IPT groups.