Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Investigating conversational dynamics in triads: Effects of noise, hearing impairment, and hearing aids.

Front Psychol · 2024 · PMC11048959 · PMID 38680286

Europe PMCDOI
3
hedged sentences
0.0540
closest p · 1.1× alpha
0.0600
boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The FTO variability also showed an effect of hearing status ( Table 1 ; Figure 4C ), indicating that the spread of the HI interlocutors’ FTO distribution was ~130 ms larger than that of the YNH and ONH interlocutors at both high and low high noise levels, although the difference between HI and ONH in the latter only approached significance ( p = 0.054). 4.2.

also in 2,355 other papers

close to significancep = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
No effect of hearing status was found on the turn duration at low background noise, although the result was close to significance ( p = 0.06).

also in 610 other papers

near-significantp = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The HI interlocutors also produced longer turns ( Figure 5A ), although the effect seemed to be largest at higher levels of background noise, as the effect of hearing status was only near-significant at the low noise level ( Tables 1 , p = 0.06).

also in 821 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.