Flexible processing of distractor stimuli under stress.

Sci Rep · 2024 · PMC11088623 · PMID 38734701

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0540

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0540

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Analysis of the VAS (see Supplementary Table S8 for descriptive data) revealed that’s stress also had a significant effect on subjective anxiety (Group × Time: F(1,2.67) = 2.77, p < 0.046, Supplementary Table S6 ) and approached significance for distress (Group × Time, F(1,2.58) = 2.68, p = 0.054) but did not affect tension (Group × Time, F(1,2.08) = 2.23, p = 0.105).

also in 8,237 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

18 its amplitude was lower in the stress group than in the control group (although this effect did not reach statistical significance for the initial rise of the LRP directly following the presentation of the distractor).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.