a clear trendp = 0.066
2 ), which was significant ( p = 0.04) In the entire cohort the decrease in ATP, although showing a clear trend, did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.066), whereas ICD shocks did decrease significantly ( p = 0.028).
2 ), which was significant ( p = 0.04) In the entire cohort the decrease in ATP, although showing a clear trend, did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.066), whereas ICD shocks did decrease significantly ( p = 0.028).
The reduction in ATP did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.066); however, ICD shocks ( p = 0.028) and ATP/shocks combined were significantly reduced ( p = 0.04).