a favorable trendp = 0.12
The analysis of secondary endpoints for MACEs also did not reach statistical significance, despite a favorable trend for the DK culotte (13% vs. 19%; p = 0.12).
The analysis of secondary endpoints for MACEs also did not reach statistical significance, despite a favorable trend for the DK culotte (13% vs. 19%; p = 0.12).
The analysis of secondary endpoints for MACEs also did not reach statistical significance, despite a favorable trend for the DK culotte (13% vs. 19%; p = 0.12).
Additionally, statistical significance was not achieved despite a clear trend favoring the DK culotte technique, which is possibly due to the small size of the study group.