approached significancep = 0.071
On the SWM task ( Figure 2A ), an interaction was observed between GA group and demand level that approached significance, F (2.77, 210.83) = 2.43, p = 0.071, partial η 2 = 0.031, ε = 0.694.
On the SWM task ( Figure 2A ), an interaction was observed between GA group and demand level that approached significance, F (2.77, 210.83) = 2.43, p = 0.071, partial η 2 = 0.031, ε = 0.694.
Although adolescents in the EPT group consistently performed less well than adolescents in the VPT group across all EF outcome measures, these between-group differences did not reach statistical significance, with the exception of the SWM task (Cohen’s d = 0.50 for the total errors score).