Barely Significant
← all excerpts

A case-by-case analysis of EPN and LPP components within a "one-picture-per-emotion-category" protocol.

Psychophysiology · 2025 · PMC11870814 · PMID 39533163

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.1210
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .001actually significant
There was a highly significant main effect of Picture Category ( F (2, 30) = 99.0, p < .001, η p 2 = .868) which was also accompanied by non‐significant effects for Time ( F (1, 15) = 3.38, p = .086, η p 2 = .184) and Time by Picture Category ( F (2, 30) = 0.34, p = .712, η p 2 = .022).

also in 132,142 other papers

approached significancep = .121not close (p > 0.1)
Post‐hoc testing revealed a significantly reduced LPP to the erotic‐erotic ( M = 0.49 μV, CI 95 = [0.11; 0.86]) as compared to the mutilation‐erotic ( M = 0.71 μV, CI 95 = [0.22; 1.19]) picture sequence ( t (15) = −2.40, p = .030, uncorrected, Cohen's d = −0.60), and the comparison with the neutral‐erotic sequence approached significance ( M = 0.71 μV, CI 95 = [0.14; 1.28]); ( t (15) = −1.64, p = .121).

also in 8,237 other papers

approaching significanceno p-value reported
This effect was replicated in the present study, with three out of four independent tests reaching significance and the remaining one approaching significance.

also in 2,640 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.