Advanced Practice Nurse Intervention Versus Usual Care for Hypertension Control: A Pilot Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) · 2025 · PMC12064933 · PMID 40346888

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

However, the difference in adjusted diastolic BP between groups did not reach statistical significance with an adjusted mean diastolic BP of 77.8 mm Hg in the experimental group versus 79.6 mm Hg in the « usual care » group (−1.85 mm Hg, p = 0.07).

also in 111,027 other papers

showed a trendp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The APN intervention significantly reduced adjusted systolic BP in the experimental group compared with the “usual care” group (−2.72 mm Hg, p = 0.04) and showed a trend toward a decrease in adjusted diastolic BP (−1.85 mm Hg, p = 0.07) and improved BP control with the APN intervention (−8.5%, p = 0.08).

also in 53,322 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported

Initial significant or borderline significant results are encouraging and suggest the benefit of an APN intervention on BP control in hypertension management.

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.