near-significantp = 0.081
In terms of Satiety Responsiveness, the improvement effect of the BCTP was near-significant compared to this dimension in the control group, with an LSM.D of −0.664 (95% CI: −1.47 to 0.14, p = 0.081).
In terms of Satiety Responsiveness, the improvement effect of the BCTP was near-significant compared to this dimension in the control group, with an LSM.D of −0.664 (95% CI: −1.47 to 0.14, p = 0.081).
In the dimensions where the intervention effects were not significant, all three interventions showed a trend towards improvements in Slowness in Eating and Emotional Undereating.