marginal significancep = 0.04
Therefore, the observed associations—particularly those with marginal significance (e.g., rs17672135, p = 0.04)—should be interpreted with caution.
Therefore, the observed associations—particularly those with marginal significance (e.g., rs17672135, p = 0.04)—should be interpreted with caution.
Conversely, our data suggest that the G/G genotype may increase the risk of developing hypertensive disorders, including severe preeclampsia; however, this association did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05).
Additionally, several SNPs showed a trend toward statistical significance, including rs2516839 ( p = 0.195), rs10757278 ( p = 0.158), and rs2713604 ( p = 0.054), warranting further investigation in larger cohorts.