showed a trendP = 0.21
Although not significant, the enhanced group showed a trend toward reduced need for additional sedation (3.1% vs 7.7%, P = 0.21), suggesting better overall tolerability of the enhanced preparation protocol (Table 7 ).
Although not significant, the enhanced group showed a trend toward reduced need for additional sedation (3.1% vs 7.7%, P = 0.21), suggesting better overall tolerability of the enhanced preparation protocol (Table 7 ).
Although the cecal intubation rate was numerically higher in the enhanced group [95.4% (62/65) vs 90.8% (59/65)], this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.21).