Effect of the reinforcement rate on goal-directed and habitual choices in a multiple schedule.

Front Psychol · 2025 · PMC12263642 · PMID 40672854

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0900

closest p · 1.8× alpha

0.1100

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The overall difference in lever pressing between groups was marginally significant, F (1, 22) = 3.05, p = 0.09, η G 2 = 0.08.

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.11not close (p > 0.1)

While the main effect of Component did not reach statistical significance, F (1, 23) = 2.83, p = 0.11, there was a significant Session × Component interaction, F (4.35, 99.95) = 9.47, MSE = 0.42, p < 0.001, η G 2 = 0.05.

also in 111,027 other papers

approached significanceno p-value reported

No effects or interactions involving Group approached significance, largest F (1, 22) = 2.00, p = 0.17. 3.2.3 Reacquisition test Figure 2C displays the response rates during the reacquisition test.

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.