Comparatively, the difference between the Control Group and Experimental Group 1 approached significance (MD = −5.931, p = 0.086), further supporting the potential of rumba training to stimulate students’ interest and capability in analyzing dance construction and stylistic nuances.
Although there was a numerical difference between Experimental Groups 1 and 2 (MD = −4.770), it did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.255), suggesting that while Latin and Standard dance styles have distinct characteristics, they did not produce fundamentally different effects on the enhancement of aesthetic sensibility within the given training period.
A p -value greater than 0.05 indicates that the data are not statistically significant, a p -value less than 0.05 indicates that the data are different, a p -value less than 0.01 indicates a significant difference, and a p -value less than 0.001 indicates a highly significant difference.