Quality and Reliability of Adolescent Sexuality Education on Chinese Video Platforms: Sentiment-Topic Analysis and Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR Form Res · 2025 · PMC12449667 · PMID 40910701

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0520

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significanceP =0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Synthesizing these results, while the overall quality difference between Bilibili and TikTok approached but did not reach statistical significance based on previous tests (adjusted P =0.052), the score distribution profile by Bilibili suggested stronger performance.

also in 111,027 other papers

failed to reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

In contrast, actionability (PEMAT-A) scores were considerably lower, ranging from moderate for Bilibili with a median of 50% (IQR 0%-67%) to low for TikTok with a median of 33% (IQR 33%-67%) and Kwai with a median of 33% (IQR 33%-59%), although these platform differences also failed to reach statistical significance.

also in 6,035 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.