borderline significancep = 0.049
Similarly, tumor size shrinkage showed borderline significance (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.01, p = 0.049) ( Fig. 7 b) ( Table 5 ).
Similarly, tumor size shrinkage showed borderline significance (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.01, p = 0.049) ( Fig. 7 b) ( Table 5 ).
Although radiographic CR did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41–1.02, p = 0.063), it showed a strong trend toward improved PFS.