Convex Versus Concave Emergence Profile of Implant-Supported Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Clin Periodontol · 2025 · PMC12531365 · PMID 40836504

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0720

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.1050

boldest claim

The sentences

a clear trendp = 0.072so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Similarly, the ITT analysis using the last observation carried forward method showed a clear trend towards greater mucosal recession in the CONVEX group compared to the CONCAVE group at the 3‐year follow‐up (OR: 4.8, 95% CI: 0.8–27.4, p = 0.072) (Table S2 ).

also in 6,709 other papers

showed a trendp = 0.105not close (p > 0.1)

3.6.3 Profilometric Measurements At region of interest 1 (ROI‐1), profilometric contour changes did not differ significantly among the three groups ( p = 0.346), although all groups showed a trend towards slight loss of contour over time ( p = 0.105) (Table 5 ).

also in 17,257 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.