Inhibitory control deficits in borderline personality disorder: a meta-analysis of stop-signal and Go/No-Go tasks.

Psychol Med · 2025 · PMC12558629 · PMID 41132047

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0710

boldest claim

The sentences

trend toward significancep = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

For reaction times on Go trials, task validity showed a non-significant trend toward significance (QM(1) = 3.25, p = 0.07), suggesting that differences in task implementation may partially account for the variability in reported response speeds between BPD and HC groups.

also in 304 other papers

showed a trendp = 0.071so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

However, in commission errors (incorrect response rate to No-Go trials), sex showed a trend-level effect (QM(1) = 3.26, p = 0.071), with some indication of a potentially lower rate of commission errors in females compared to males, though this result did not reach statistical significance.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.