Comparative Outcomes of Alternative Access Site Versus Lithotripsy-Assisted Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Cardiol Res · 2025 · PMC12571132 · PMID 41170017

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendno p-value reported

Short-term outcomes At 1 month post-procedure, the AAS group showed a trend toward higher adverse outcomes compared to the lithotripsy group (AAS 17.1% (95% CI: 8.5% - 31.3%) vs.

also in 53,322 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

The observation of fewer 30-day adverse events in the IVL-TF group (0% (95% CI: 0.0% - 16.8%)) versus the AAS group (17.1% (95% CI: 8.5% - 31.3%)) did not reach statistical significance and should be viewed as hypothesis-generating.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.