A notable difference was observed in the rate of surgical revisions, with PRESERFLO showing a lower revision rate (28.6%) compared to XEN (42.9%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance.
← all excerpts
Matching of XEN®45 and PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt cases: Outcomes of a 3-year follow-up.
2
—
—
The sentences
Regarding surgical success, using stricter criteria (Category A: IOP ≤ 15 mmHg without medication), PRESERFLO showed a trend toward higher success rates at one year (45.9% vs. 34.2% for XEN), though not statistically significant.