a strong trendP = 0.051
In the per-protocol analysis, there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79 FC; 95% CI, 0.62–1; P = 0.051).
In the per-protocol analysis, there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79 FC; 95% CI, 0.62–1; P = 0.051).
The mean global count showed no effect of HAMSB compared with LAMS (0.87 FC; 95% CI, 0.73–1.05; P = 0.152), whereas the mean count of small polyps approached significance (0.79 FC; 95% CI, 0.62–1.0; P = 0.051).