Comparable Outcomes in Redo Total Arch Replacement for Previous Aortic Dissection vs. Other Cardiac Surgeries: A Single-Center Pilot Study of the E-Vita Open Hybrid Prosthesis.

J Clin Med · 2025 · PMC12609136 · PMID 41226985

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0530

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0530

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.053so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

However, Group 1 patients showed a trend toward longer operative times (580.07 ± 126.84 vs. 481.25 ± 119.29 min, p = 0.053), which may reflect the increased technical complexity of operating on previously dissected tissue.

also in 53,322 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.053so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Operative Outcomes and Technical Considerations A key finding of this study is the trend toward longer operative times in patients with previous Type A dissection repair compared to those with other prior cardiac surgeries, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (580.07 ± 126.84 vs. 481.25 ± 119.29 min, p = 0.053).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.