showed a trendp = 0.071
No significant differences in OS, cGRFS, cGvHD, relapse, or NRM were observed between the two dose groups, although EFS showed a trend favoring 2.5 mg/kg ( p = 0.071; Supplementary Fig. 5 ).
No significant differences in OS, cGRFS, cGvHD, relapse, or NRM were observed between the two dose groups, although EFS showed a trend favoring 2.5 mg/kg ( p = 0.071; Supplementary Fig. 5 ).
After IPTW weighting, the results were similar, with ATG showing only a trend toward inferior EFS ( p = 0.09) and increased relapse risk ( p = 0.08), which did not reach statistical significance.