Zero-profile devices versus traditional cage-plate systems for geriatric osteoporotic patients with cervical degenerative disc disease: a retrospective analysis of 190 patients.

Eur J Med Res · 2025 · PMC12751201 · PMID 41310795

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0570

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0570

boldest claim

The sentences

a strong trendp = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Importantly, our analysis revealed a strong trend toward a higher rate of subsidence in the ZPD group compared to the CPS group (9.9% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.057) and multivariate logistic regression analysis, which controlled for confounding factors such as BMD, identified the implant type as an independent and significant predictor of subsidence risk (OR 5.479, 95% CI 1.269–23.666, P = 0.023).

also in 5,725 other papers

showed a trendP = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The ZPD group showed a trend towards a higher subsidence rate (9.9% vs 2.8%, P = 0.057), which was further confirmed by multivariate analysis identifying ZPD as an independent risk factor (OR 5.479, P = 0.023).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.