approached significancep = 0.082
Food security predicted sustainable preferences (β = 0.097, 95% CI [0.045–0.149], p = 0.001), while the interaction term approached significance (β = 0.051, p = 0.082).
Food security predicted sustainable preferences (β = 0.097, 95% CI [0.045–0.149], p = 0.001), while the interaction term approached significance (β = 0.051, p = 0.082).
The interaction between food security and nutrition literacy revealed a finding at the threshold of significance (β = 0.051, p = 0.082 ), indicating a potential moderating effect (Table 5 ).
A simple slopes analysis at low (–1 SD), medium (0), and high (+ 1 SD) levels of nutrition literacy confirmed a positive trend.
Although the term “interaction” remains at the limit of significance, it suggests that nutrition literacy can play a regulatory role.