highly significantp = 0.0010
This moderator had a strong and highly significant effect (F (1,160) = 11.19, p = 0.0010).
This moderator had a strong and highly significant effect (F (1,160) = 11.19, p = 0.0010).
While the analysis was borderline significant (F (1) = 2.93, p = 0.0867), Radiomics-only models showed a trend toward reduced performance (DOR: 8.254, p = 0.089), with a slight reduction in between-study variance (σ2 = 0.328).
However, this model did not reach statistical significance (F (5,156) = 1.60, p = 0.164), and the individual coefficients showed wide confidence intervals with considerable overlap, indicating substantial heterogeneity even within cancer subtypes.
DL) The model category variable, differentiating between machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), did not yield a significant moderating effect (F (1) = 1.86, p = 0.1722), although machine learning models showed a trend toward better performance (DOR: 10.625, p:0.174).