Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Diagnostic performance of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for thyroid cancer metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak · 2025 · PMC12798119 · PMID 41361881

4
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.1640
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = 0.0010actually significant
This moderator had a strong and highly significant effect (F (1,160) = 11.19, p = 0.0010).

also in 132,142 other papers

borderline significantp = 0.0867so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
While the analysis was borderline significant (F (1) = 2.93, p = 0.0867), Radiomics-only models showed a trend toward reduced performance (DOR: 8.254, p = 0.089), with a slight reduction in between-study variance (σ2 = 0.328).

also in 11,409 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.164not close (p > 0.1)
However, this model did not reach statistical significance (F (5,156) = 1.60, p = 0.164), and the individual coefficients showed wide confidence intervals with considerable overlap, indicating substantial heterogeneity even within cancer subtypes.

also in 111,027 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported
DL) The model category variable, differentiating between machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), did not yield a significant moderating effect (F (1) = 1.86, p = 0.1722), although machine learning models showed a trend toward better performance (DOR: 10.625, p:0.174).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.