approached significanceP = 0.07
However, a significant effect of time was found, F (2, 36) = 3.95, P = 0.03, whereas the time × group interaction effect approached significance, F (2, 36) = 2.91, P = 0.07.
However, a significant effect of time was found, F (2, 36) = 3.95, P = 0.03, whereas the time × group interaction effect approached significance, F (2, 36) = 2.91, P = 0.07.
Post hoc comparisons showed a trend toward a smaller CPS at 1 day post-training for both groups (active a-tDCS, from 1.23 ± 0.12 to 1.14 ± 0.13 logMAR; sham a-tDCS, from 1.44 ± 0.13 to 1.35 ± 0.12 logMAR; P = 0.06).