Open Versus Closed Reduction in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: The Critical Role of Acceptable Reduction in Healing Outcomes.

Cureus · 2025 · PMC12811046 · PMID 41552216

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp<0.001actually significant

This difference was highly significant (χ2=20.4, p<0.001), showing that poor reduction quality was strongly associated with delayed healing (Table 3 ).

also in 132,142 other papers

borderline non-significantp=0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

This difference was borderline non-significant (t(108)=-1.94, p=0.055; mean difference -3.0 weeks, 95% CI -6.1 to 0.06) (Table 2 ).

also in 434 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep=0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The difference between open and closed reduction groups approached but did not reach statistical significance (χ2=5.59, p=0.06) (Table 2 ).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.