showed a trendp = 0.08
These patients also showed a trend toward greater LVMI (140.3 g/m2 vs. 127.7 g/m2, p = 0.08), although EF and heart failure prevalence (LVEF <40%) were comparable between groups.
These patients also showed a trend toward greater LVMI (140.3 g/m2 vs. 127.7 g/m2, p = 0.08), although EF and heart failure prevalence (LVEF <40%) were comparable between groups.
Seventh, subgroup analyses stratified by diabetes status and prior CVD showed consistent directional effects for the dual-marker model, but improvements in IDI and NRI did not reach statistical significance in these high-risk subgroups.