A comparison between robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery and conventional craniotomy for intracerebral hemorrhage: efficiency, complications and outcomes.

Front Neurol · 2025 · PMC12827066 · PMID 41586095

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.1740

closest p · 3.5× alpha

0.1990

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendP = 0.174not close (p > 0.1)

Upon discharge, the RA-MIS group showed a trend toward better functional outcomes, with a mean mRS score of 3.29 ± 1.628 compared to 3.90 ± 1.210 in the craniotomy group ( P = 0.174, Figure 4F ).

also in 53,322 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.199not close (p > 0.1)

At admission, the mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was slightly higher in the RA-MIS group (9.61 ± 0.67) than in the craniotomy group (8.20 ± 0.84), but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.199).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.