highly significantp < 0.001
Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test revealed a highly significant difference in survival distributions between the two groups (χ 2 = 35.64, p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 ).
Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test revealed a highly significant difference in survival distributions between the two groups (χ 2 = 35.64, p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 ).
Medium and small body size were not significantly associated with NT after adjustment, although medium-sized dogs again showed a trend (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.99–2.05, p = 0.053).
mixed), habitat, and body size were not significantly associated with NT in univariate analysis, although medium-sized dogs approached significance (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.99–1.96, p = 0.060).