showed a trendp = 0.077
Egger’s test was significant ( p = 0.037), while Harbord’s test showed a trend ( p = 0.077), and Peters’ test was non-significant ( p = 0.217).
Egger’s test was significant ( p = 0.037), while Harbord’s test showed a trend ( p = 0.077), and Peters’ test was non-significant ( p = 0.217).
By contrast, remote/telemedicine programs (6 trials) did not reach statistical significance (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91–1.08; I2 = 0.0%).