Left ventricular functional outcomes in His vs. left bundle branch area pacing: Is lead distance important in LBBAP implantation?

BMC Cardiovasc Disord · 2026 · PMC12896342 · PMID 41555260

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendno p-value reported

Both groups showed a trend toward improved LV function, but the LBBAP group experienced a greater increase.

also in 53,322 other papers

a positive trendno p-value reported

HBP), the association between baseline QRS duration and baseline LVEF remained significant, while LBBAP showed a positive trend toward LVEF improvement (OR 1.73; 95% CI 0.83–3.61), although it did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.143).

also in 11,005 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

Parameters of ventricular synchrony, such as PSD and LVMD, decreased in both groups, indicating improved mechanical synchrony, although the reduction did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.