Adolescents' Responses to High-Intensity Versus Standard Physical Education on Body Fat, Blood Pressure, and VO<sub>2</sub>max: A Secondary Analysis Using TE-Based Responder Classification.

Healthcare (Basel) · 2026 · PMC12897331 · PMID 41682260

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0500

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0630

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep > 0.05actually significant

Although this descriptive difference suggests a weaker cardiorespiratory adaptation to HIPT, it did not reach statistical significance in the multinomial logistic regression model (all p > 0.05), and therefore should be interpreted with caution. 4.

also in 111,027 other papers

a near-significant trendp = 0.063so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A near-significant trend was also found for DBP ( p = 0.063).

also in 290 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.

Adolescents' Responses to High-Intensity Versus Standard Physical Education on Body Fat, Blood Pressure, and VO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;max: A Secondary Analysis Using TE-Based Responder Classification.

The sentences

Adolescents' Responses to High-Intensity Versus Standard Physical Education on Body Fat, Blood Pressure, and VO<sub>2</sub>max: A Secondary Analysis Using TE-Based Responder Classification.