highly significantp < 0.001
At interface 1 (LCI; restoration to luting composite), LS2 showed a highly significant continuous increase in gap formation (LGVC) from t0 to t2/t3 ( p < 0.001, effect size = 0.9, Figure 2 e, Supplement file S1 Tab.9 ).
At interface 1 (LCI; restoration to luting composite), LS2 showed a highly significant continuous increase in gap formation (LGVC) from t0 to t2/t3 ( p < 0.001, effect size = 0.9, Figure 2 e, Supplement file S1 Tab.9 ).
Regarding the different indirect materials, RBC showed a trend towards larger gap values at the enamel (LGVE) compared to LS2.
The few long-term clinical studies are probably too heterogeneous in their study design and do not indicate a clear trend, yet they reveal initial causes of failure.