Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Avoiding False-Positive Glaucoma Diagnosis in Myopic Eyes: Clinical Importance of OCT Scan Diameter.

J Clin Med · 2026 · PMC12941815 · PMID 41753357

4
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.2780
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant
All segments demonstrated highly significant within-subject effects across the three circle diameters (all p < 0.001), indicating that RNFLT varied significantly with scan diameter.

also in 83,176 other papers

near-significantp = 0.069so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Near-significant differences were observed between controls and high myopia in the N sector ( p = 0.069) and between controls and mild myopia in NI ( p = 0.066). 3.2.

also in 1,669 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.278not close (p > 0.1)
Differences in other segments did not reach statistical significance (NS: p = 0.278; N: p = 0.501; NI: p = 0.419; T: p = 0.152; TS: p = 0.544) ( Table 3 ). 3.3.

also in 75,281 other papers

borderline significanceno p-value reported
At C3, only NI remained statistically significant (AUC = 0.637, p = 0.007), while NS (AUC = 0.586, p = 0.089), N (AUC = 0.587, p = 0.086), and TI (AUC = 0.596, p = 0.058) showed borderline significance.

also in 4,327 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.