Awareness of consequences (AC) was marginally higher among star-rating users than non-rating users, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (91% vs. 79%, p = 0.059).
← all excerpts
Developing an Empirical Theory of Planned Behavior Model of Healthy Dietary Choice and Evaluating Gamified Feedback Among Japanese Young Adults.
2
0.0590
0.0590
The sentences
near-significantp = 0.059
Compared with the non-rating version, the star-rating group was observed to show: Lower self-efficacy and behavior scores, suggesting that objective feedback may initially highlight the difficulty of achieving nutritional balance and temporarily reduce perceived competence; Slightly higher (near-significant) awareness of consequences ( p = 0.059), indicating elevated recognition of dietary risks.