marginally significantp = 0.06
During the reward delivery event, the cOFC did not exhibit a significant trend (t(4) = − 0.29, p = 0.78), but the pACC exhibited a marginally significant effect (t(4) = − 2.55, p = 0.06).
During the reward delivery event, the cOFC did not exhibit a significant trend (t(4) = − 0.29, p = 0.78), but the pACC exhibited a marginally significant effect (t(4) = − 2.55, p = 0.06).
The cOFC units showed a trend to be more active across most task events.
These findings demonstrate a significant trend for the cOFC units recorded to be more actively involved during events related to reward processing and the initiation of trials, possibly linked to attentional and reward-evaluation processes, whereas the pACC units recorded showed greater involvement during events associated with aversive outcomes, such as the delivery of airpuffs following particular choices or cues.