borderline significancep = 0.074
The association showed borderline significance by the Wald test ( p = 0.074) and was supported by the likelihood ratio and score tests ( p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively) ( Table 4 ).
The association showed borderline significance by the Wald test ( p = 0.074) and was supported by the likelihood ratio and score tests ( p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively) ( Table 4 ).
In Cox regression analysis, HPV16 positivity showed a higher estimated hazard of CIN3; however, the association did not reach statistical significance and confidence intervals were wide, reflecting the limited number of outcome events.
In the Cox regression model, HPV16 positivity showed a trend toward an increased hazard of progression to CIN3, although the estimate was imprecise and did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.146) ( Table 2 ).