showed a trendp < 0.01
When pooled across studies, TMB-high compared with TMB-low showed a trend toward improved PFS (pooled HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33–0.7, p < 0.01).
When pooled across studies, TMB-high compared with TMB-low showed a trend toward improved PFS (pooled HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33–0.7, p < 0.01).
In the present meta-analysis, the pooled random-effects hazard ratio for the impact of liver metastases on overall survival was 1.88 (95% CI 0.77–4.60), indicating a trend toward worse survival in patients with liver metastases; however, this association did not reach statistical significance, as shown in Figure 31 .
The pooled random-effects hazard ratio was 1.52 (95% CI 1.00–2.33, p = 0.05), suggesting a borderline significant association between the presence of brain metastases and worse PFS, as shown in Figure 28 .