Mental preparedness in future responders: analyzing anxiety and stress profiles.

BMC Psychol · 2026 · PMC13032461 · PMID 41721375

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0540

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0660

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally non-significantp = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Results revealed a marginally non-significant difference, Welch's F(1, 294) = 3.76, p = 0.054, partial η 2 = 0.013 (small effect).

also in 662 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Significant Social Concern Items: " I worry that other people will notice my anxiety " (Item 4): 13.3% of females versus 7.7% of males, χ 2 (1) = 8.71, p = 0.003, φ = 0.17 (small effect; marginally significant after Bonferroni: p = 0.054).

also in 9,321 other papers

approaching significancep = 0.066so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Three primary findings emerged: No Overall Gender Differences But Approaching Significance: Total anxiety sensitivity scores did not differ significantly between female (M = 24.7) and male (M = 21.6) students, t(298) = −1.85, p = 0.066, d = 0.21.

also in 1,108 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.066so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Results showed that the difference between female students (M = 24.7, SD = 12.3) and male students (M = 21.6, SD = 10.9) approached but did not reach statistical significance, t(298) = −1.85, p = 0.066, 95% CI [−6.4, 0.2].

also in 58,632 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.