showed a trendp = 0.066
4 ), the MSD group showed a trend toward inferior OS ( p = 0.066) and RFS ( p = 0.052) compared with the alternative donor group, accompanied by a higher relapse rate ( p = 0.003).
4 ), the MSD group showed a trend toward inferior OS ( p = 0.066) and RFS ( p = 0.052) compared with the alternative donor group, accompanied by a higher relapse rate ( p = 0.003).
Both UD and HID showed lower hazard ratios for RFS compared with MSD (HR 0.721 95% CI 0.467–1.114, and HR 0.695, 95% CI 0.462–1.046, respectively), though only HID exhibited a marginal trend toward improved outcomes ( p = 0.081).
Although UD and HID showed lower hazard ratios for mortality compared to MSD, these did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.275 and p = 0.209, respectively).