Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Impact of a clinical decision protocol on survival and neurological outcome following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

J Intensive Care · 2026 · PMC13097924 · PMID 41840638

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0680
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant
While patients fulfilling only 1, 2, or 3 criteria had very low survival and good neurological outcome, patients fulfilling the 4 criteria had a 48% hospital survival, with a good neurological outcome of 30%, a highly significant difference compared to 1, 2, or 3 criteria ( p < 0.001).

also in 132,142 other papers

showed a trendp = 0.061so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
In comparison to all other patients, they showed a trend for better hospital survival (16.2 vs. 5.2%, p = 0.061), but no significant improvement in good neurological outcome (8.2 vs. 2.6%, p = 0.179).

also in 53,322 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.068so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
As shown in Additional File 3 , patients with a low flow < 60 min had better survival and good neurological outcome than those with a low flow of 60–80 min, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (survival, p = 0.068; CPC 1–2, p = 0.279).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.