nominally significantp = 0.020
Notably, State 5 exhibited a nominally significant reduction in the hallucination‐present group ( d = 1.11, raw p = 0.020), though this did not survive FDR correction ( p FDR = 0.061).
Notably, State 5 exhibited a nominally significant reduction in the hallucination‐present group ( d = 1.11, raw p = 0.020), though this did not survive FDR correction ( p FDR = 0.061).
In contrast, State 3 showed a marginal between‐group difference that approached but did not reach statistical significance ( d = −0.08, p FDR = 0.058), while State 2 demonstrated no discernible group‐level variation ( d = −0.10, p FDR = 0.328).