Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparative analysis of prepectoral and subpectoral standalone placement of Microthane<sup>Ⓡ</sup> breast implants in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective study.

JPRAS Open · 2026 · PMC13133667 · PMID 42077662

3
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

a numerical trendno p-value reported
Similarly, it is possible to observe a numerical trend in favor of the prepectoral position regarding the CC rate, even if the data did not reach statistical significance.

also in 708 other papers

a strong trendno p-value reported
Moreover, the same survival analysis, divided by implant position, ( Figure 4 ), displayed a strong trend in favor of prepectoral position, with an incidence of any complication at the end of follow-up for prepectoral position of 66.6% (CI: 47.5%, 93.4%), and of 52.53% for subpectoral position (CI: 35.7%, 77.2%) ( p -value = 0.0992).

also in 2,992 other papers

Similarly, it is possible to observe a numerical trend in favor of the prepectoral position regarding the CC rate, even if the data did not reach statistical significance.

also in 61,332 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.