Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparative Efficacy of Bifurcation Stenting Techniques for Left Main Disease: A Network Meta-analysis With Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv · 2026 · PMC13198097 · PMID 42183124

3
hedged sentences
0.0990
closest p · 2.0× alpha
0.7239
boldest claim

The sentences

a nonsignificant trendP = .099so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Provisional stenting demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward reduced MACE compared with classic crush (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.50-1.06; P = .099).

also in 5,406 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceP = .7239not close (p > 0.1)
Provisional stenting showed a numerically higher hazard that did not reach statistical significance (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.41-3.61; P = .7239).

also in 111,027 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported
Observational evidence from the EVOLUTE-CRUSH LM registry found no significant differences between DK crush and minicrush in complex LM lesions, although DK crush showed a trend toward a greater durability.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.