20.59 ± 2.13 D; mean difference 1.57 D, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.93; p = 0.026), whereas ACD showed a medium effect size between-group difference that did not reach statistical significance at the patient level (3.15 ± 0.39 vs. 2.92 ± 0.33 mm; mean difference 0.23 mm, 95% CI −0.01 to 0.46; p = 0.056).
← all excerpts
Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Two Enhanced Monofocal IOLs.
4
0.0560
0.0690
The sentences
narrowly missed significancep = 0.056
Anterior chamber depth showed a medium effect size difference (d = 0.60) that narrowly missed significance ( p = 0.056).
a numerical trendp = 0.069
At the monocular level, DCNVA showed a numerical trend favoring TECNIS EyhanceTM (0.255 ± 0.118 vs. 0.325 ± 0.112 logMAR) that did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.069) and for which equivalence was not demonstrated (TOST p = 0.212).
Furthermore, the refractive stability of the EvoluxTM group, which showed a trend toward a myopic shift, cannot be confirmed at one month; longer follow-up would be required to determine whether this shift persists, resolves, or progresses [ 16 ].